Employee Experience Consulting
Your Best People Leave Quietly. The Engagement Score Never Catches It.
Measuring employee experience tells you where things stand today. Designing it is what determines whether your best people are still there next year.
When Organizations Call Us
The Warning Signs Rarely Show Up In The Survey First
You already know some of these. A plateau in engagement scores that three action plans have not moved. Attrition that keeps landing on your best people, not your average ones. A change initiative that is quietly costing you more than the org chart shows. These are the moments that bring organizations to Stewart Leadership, and each one is a version of the same problem. Something real is happening that the standard measurement was never built to catch.
Engagement Has Plateaued And Nothing You Have Tried Has Moved It
You have run the survey for years. The same themes surface. You build the action plans, you resource them, and the score barely moves. The problem was never the measurement. It was that every intervention addressed the symptom the survey could see, not the condition underneath it.
Your Attrition Data Points At Experience, Not Pay
The exit interviews are consistent, and pay is rarely the answer. People are leaving for clearer career paths and better managers. Raising compensation will not fix an experience problem, and the people you can least afford to lose are the ones least likely to have said anything on the way out.
A Change Initiative Is Costing You More Than The Org Chart Shows
A restructuring, a merger, a leadership change, or a strategic shift is affecting how people experience the organization right now, in ways that show up in productivity and discretionary effort long before they show up in a survey. Reactive responses cannot keep pace with something moving this fast.
The Experience You Promise Candidates Is Not The One They Find
The employer brand describes an experience that new hires arrive to find is different. Offer acceptance is softer than it should be. Early tenure attrition is higher than it should be. In a talent market where candidates compare notes, that gap does not stay quiet for long.
You Have Accountability For The Experience, Not Authority Over What Drives It
Employee experience is shaped by manager quality, leadership decisions, work design, and career development access, most of which sits outside your direct control. You have been handed the outcome without being handed everything that produces it.
The Design Approach
Diagnosis Is Not the Same as Design.
Most employee experience work stops at measurement. You run the survey, the pulse check, the exit interview, and you get a clear picture of what is wrong. What you do not get is a plan for what to build instead. That gap, between knowing the diagnosis and designing the cure, is where most employee experience investment quietly stalls.
Connected To The Outcomes Your Business Actually Cares About
An employee experience program that moves engagement scores but cannot connect that movement to retention, productivity, or the talent you are trying to attract will not survive its next budget review. We design employee experience from the business outcome backward, starting with what your organization needs the experience to produce.
Built Around The Moments That Matter Most
Not every moment in the employee journey carries equal weight. Onboarding, performance conversations, career development discussions, manager transitions, and the moments of organizational change do more to shape how people experience your organization than anything else. Designing around these moments produces more impact per dollar than programs spread thin across the full journey.
Prioritized For What You Can Actually Change
A design agenda only matters if it fits inside the authority you actually have. We prioritize around what is addressable, the manager behaviors, conditions, and touchpoints within your scope, and build the business case for what requires authority beyond HR to address. That is what makes this yours to keep and act on, not a report that sits in a drawer.
Our Employee Experience Framework
Seven Moments Shape Whether Your Best People Stay Or Start Looking
Employee experience is not one thing measured once a year. It moves through seven distinct stages, from how someone experiences your organization before they ever apply to whether they become an advocate after they leave. Each stage has its own risks and its own design requirements.

I'm Excited
Employer brand and reputation shape expectations before a single application arrives.

I'm Joining
Recruitment and the offer set the tone for everything that follows.

I'm Onboarding
Orientation and training determine how quickly someone becomes productive and how confident they feel getting there.

I'm Succeeding
Performance conversations and coaching shape whether someone feels equipped or exposed.

I'm Rewarded
Rewards and recognition confirm whether contribution is actually seen.

I'm Championing
Advocacy and referrals are the clearest sign the experience worked.
What Changes
What Organizations Achieve With Intentional Employee Experience Design
Engagement That Moves And Stays Moved
An engagement intervention treats the symptom. Experience design treats the conditions. When you target the moments and manager behaviors that actually drive engagement, the improvement holds instead of reverting after the program ends.
Retention Of The Talent You Have Already Invested In
Turnover that traces back to experience, not compensation, gets addressed at the experience level. When you deliberately design the conditions that make your best people want to stay, clear career paths, effective managers, meaningful work, real recognition, the attrition pattern starts to shift.
A Strategic Voice In Business Performance
Employee experience work designed around business outcomes, retention rates, productivity indicators, talent attraction metrics, discretionary effort, produces evidence that earns continued investment. That is what turns HR into a business partner rather than a survey administrator.
Ready To Start Designing The Employee Experience Rather Than Just Measuring It?
The starting point is a conversation about the outcomes you are trying to affect, what your current experience data is telling you, and what intentional design could produce that your current programs have not. We will listen and be direct about where the highest leverage interventions are.
Featured Client Result
Unifying Five Acquisitions Into One Aligned Leadership Team
→ Read the full transcript
Hi, I am Steve Brewer, executive of Insurance Solutions at CoreLogic, and I want to share with you a little bit about my journey with Stewart Leadership today.
Now, CoreLogic helps power insurance companies to deliver trusted moments that help families and businesses protect and restore their properties.
And we were created about five years ago from the combination of five businesses that all came together to create a new operating division within CoreLogic.
Now, you can imagine that's a pretty tall task. It is been fun, but man, has it been a challenge. And I'll tell you some of the, some of the challenges we faced.
First and foremost, we started, we had five acquisitions. We had to integrate all at one time. Three were already in play, two were in process. Uh, and it was my job to bring together a senior leadership team that would truly be cohesive and serve as a foundation of rapid growth for a new vertical for our business.
It was a tall task, and if I could be honest, it was a little overwhelming. Um, and there's a couple different dimensions, um, that I, that I engaged with, with Stewart Leadership.
The first was, as an executive coach for me personally stepping into a role leading a business, um, just really having that one-on-one, interaction, guidance and perspective, uh, from the Stewart Leadership team on, on making critical decisions, um, being decisive and really engaging and finding out what my team needed from me as their executive.
Second, I knew we needed to create a very cohesive senior leadership team if we were gonna have success in bringing these acquisitions together. And that meant bringing executives from many different, um, uh, places across different, uh, cultures together and building trust and accelerating that process of team building.
It was so critical for our success. Uh, and we worked with Stewart Leadership Team very, uh, very heavily on that dimension. Um, and they actually, uh, some of those leaders brought in Stewart Leadership for their departments to do the very same things.
So just, you know, that, that one-on-one engagement, um, you know, bringing those best practices to bear as we, as we help facilitate, um, uh, that, that team formation just been so critical for our success.
And third, the acquisition blueprint. This has been something I've been excited to work with, uh, the Stewart Leadership team on is really the eight dimensions of culture. Bringing in, uh, a, a tech startup into a large information services company. That's a daunting task. Um, and this was a, this was a, a task in which we needed their capabilities.
And so, um, really, uh, working with Stewart leadership to, uh, level set and really go through a cultural assessment, figure out where the Delta and the, and the GAP score and where we could celebrate the success.of both organizations. It just, it, it, it ultimately has been very successful. And I think a large part of that has been our work with the Stewart Leadership team.
And then finally, I think the thing that stands out to me, uh, we work with a lot of executive development and, and, and leadership organizations across CoreLogic, uh, and, and, and they all bring, uh, fantastic things for me. The reason I have used through leadership more than others is, one, it's a really, it's a really nice combination of, uh, best practice and thought leadership, but practically applied. You know, they're one-on-One work with my team. The interviews they do before our sessions, it really tailors the message. It really tailors the content into what our teams need at the moment, uh, that we're having those sessions. Um, leadership development has been fantastic.
And I guess at the end of the day, um, it's exciting because I really feel that when I work with Stewart Leadership, not only do I get the, the, you know, the results that we're looking for to, to build and, and, and challenge our teams to succeed, uh, but that I have an advocate in our corner. I mean, they understood our business after a very short period of time and they really, really, uh have a vested interest in our success. And I think that's truly for me, what sets 'em apart from the others we've worked with.
So I wish you the best in your endeavors and, uh, thanks to the Stewart Leadership Team for all you've done for us over the years.
Client: CoreLogic
Engagement Focus: Post-aquisition executive team alignment
Business Need: Unite leaders and streamline decision making post-transaction
Results:
- Unified executives from five acquired businesses
- Built trust and alignment across distinct cultures
- Strengthened executive leadership capability
- Created a repeatable acquisition integration blueprint
- Expanded impact into additional teams and functions
Common Questions About Employee Experience
What is employee experience consulting, and what does it actually include?
Employee experience consulting is the work of designing the conditions employees encounter across their time with an organization, not just measuring how they feel about those conditions after the fact. It covers the full arc from how a candidate experiences the brand before applying, through onboarding, performance, growth, recognition, and eventually advocacy or referral once someone has moved on. A consulting engagement typically starts with a diagnostic of where the experience is breaking down, then moves into designing the specific moments and manager behaviors that need to change, with measurement built in from the start so the organization can see whether the design is producing the outcomes it needs.
What is the difference between employee experience and employee engagement?
Employee engagement is a measure, typically a survey score capturing how employees feel about their work at a given point in time. Employee experience is broader. It is the full set of moments, interactions, and conditions that produce that feeling in the first place, from how someone is recruited and onboarded to how they are coached, recognized, and eventually how they leave. Engagement tells you where things stand today. Employee experience design is what determines whether next year's score looks any different, because it addresses the actual conditions producing the number rather than just tracking it.
What does an employee experience strategy involve?
An employee experience strategy identifies which moments in the employee journey matter most for the outcomes an organization cares about, then builds a deliberate plan for designing those moments rather than leaving them to chance. It typically starts with a diagnostic of where the current experience is strongest and weakest, connects that diagnostic to specific business outcomes like retention or talent attraction, and prioritizes the highest leverage interventions rather than attempting to improve every touchpoint at once. A strategy without this prioritization tends to produce activity without measurable movement in the outcomes it was meant to affect.
What is involved in employee experience design specifically?
Employee experience design is the practice of intentionally building the moments, manager behaviors, and organizational conditions that produce a specific employee experience, rather than measuring the experience that already exists and reporting on the gaps. It treats onboarding, performance conversations, career development, recognition, and organizational change as design problems with specific interventions available, not as conditions that simply happen to an organization. The distinction matters because measurement alone identifies what is wrong without ever specifying what to build in its place.
What are the stages of the employee experience, and why do they matter?
The employee experience moves through seven distinct stages, from a candidate's first impression of the employer brand through active advocacy after someone has left the organization. Each stage carries its own risks and requires its own design. A candidate's early impression shapes whether they apply at all. Onboarding shapes how quickly someone becomes productive. Recognition shapes whether people stay engaged once they are established. Treating these as one undifferentiated experience misses where the real breakdowns are happening. Stewart Leadership's Employee Experience Framework maps all seven stages and the specific design work each one requires.
How do you measure whether employee experience work is actually producing results?
Employee experience work should be measured against the specific business outcomes it was designed to affect, not against engagement scores alone. That means connecting the design work to retention rates for the people the organization can least afford to lose, internal mobility and promotion data, talent attraction and offer acceptance metrics, and productivity or discretionary effort indicators where they are available. Measurement built in at the start of an engagement, tied to a clear baseline, is what makes it possible to show whether a specific intervention produced movement, rather than discovering a year later that nothing changed.
What role do managers play in employee experience, and how is that addressed?
Managers are the single most powerful driver of employee experience. The relationship with the immediate manager shapes how someone experiences feedback, recognition, growth opportunities, and support through change more than any organization-level program does. Employee experience design that does not address manager capability is working around its primary variable. Stewart Leadership builds manager development into employee experience engagements directly, developing the specific behaviors, how managers give feedback, coach performance, recognize contribution, and communicate during change, that shape the experience employees actually have day to day.
